The FARO CMM, a $78 Hydrostatic Level Sensor, and the Real Price of a Cheap Quote

Posted on 2026-09-07 by Marcus Feld

April 2024. I wasn't thinking about accuracy specifications. I was thinking about which vendor renewal was about to sneak past me. Then the quality manager appeared at my desk. He didn't say 'coordinate measuring machine.' He said 'FARO CMM,' as if that settled every question I might have. I typed 'faro cmm' into Google and started down a rabbit hole that cost me sleep and my faith in logos.

I should explain my job. At a 180-person precision manufacturing company, I'm the office administrator who handles procurement. That means I buy everything from copier paper to hydrostatic level sensors. I manage roughly $1.1 million in annual orders across 15 active vendors. When something stops working, nobody says 'the vendor sent a bad product.' They say 'why did you buy this?'

The FARO Logo Made Me Feel Safe

The quality manager wanted a portable FARO CMM arm for checking fixtures on the production floor. A new FARO CMM with calibration and training came in around $58,000. A second vendor offered a 'certified used FARO CMM' for $34,000. The second quote felt safer than it should have because it included the FARO logo—on the PDF, on the email signature, on the website. I remember thinking that if a company displays the official logo, they must be legitimate. That is not how logos work.

I forwarded the lower quote to the quality manager with a note: 'Great deal.' He asked one question I hadn't asked: 'Are they an authorized FARO reseller?' I didn't know the answer. I didn't know there was a difference until the used arm arrived.

The arm powered up. It moved the way a CMM arm should move. It had a FARO logo on the arm base and another on the control box. When I searched 'faro logo' to compare what the seller had used, I couldn't see an obvious problem. The problem showed up when the calibration certificate arrived: a one-page PDF with no serial number, no equipment ID, no uncertainty statement. Just a line that said 'factory traceable.'

The quality manager called FARO support with the serial number. The answer was not dramatic. It was worse: 'We don't show a service record for this unit in our system.' The logo was real, but the traceability behind it wasn't.

A FARO logo does not make a FARO CMM traceable. A service record does.

We sent the arm to an independent metrology lab. It came back in tolerance, and that part was fine. But the measurement job didn't wait. The fixtures were measured by an outside service at overtime rates. Add the independent calibration, the extra freight, the phone calls, and the hours I spent chasing a response, and the $24,000 'discount' nearly disappeared. I still kick myself for not asking the authorized reseller question before the PO. It was one question that would have saved weeks.

A Hydrostatic Level Sensor Taught Me the Same Lesson for $78

Before the FARO CMM saga was fully over, I repeated the mistake on a smaller scale. Maintenance needed a hydrostatic level sensor for a parts-washing tank. The spec was straightforward: 4-20 mA output, stainless body, compatible with our controller. Our normal supplier quoted $312 for an ifm hydrostatic level sensor. An online listing offered a 'hydrostatic level sensor' with the same words for $78. The listing even said 'equivalent to ifm.' I clicked buy without checking who was selling it.

It worked for 11 days. On day 12, the output started drifting and set off a false alarm. The supplier's support number went to a fax machine. The order confirmation email bounced. We replaced it with the ifm sensor and paid a technician to do the swap during a scheduled shutdown. The $78 sensor became a $900 lesson.

How IFM Sensors Compare with Omron and Keyence

After that failure, our controls engineer forwarded me a document that had been sitting in my inbox. The subject line was exactly 'how ifm sensors compare with omron and keyence'—all lowercase, because he wrote it in a hurry. I had ignored it because I thought all sensor brands were basically the same. They are not, and the document showed why.

IFM, Omron, and Keyence all make level sensors with similar ranges, outputs, and housing options. The differences were small but real: mounting style, display readability, response time, compatibility with our PLC, and the level of detail in the manual. What all three had in common mattered more. Each one had a datasheet that matched the product on the shelf. Each one had a support phone number that people answered. The $78 sensor had none of those. It was compatible only in the sense that it had wires.

The Microscope, the Gold Coast Mining Company, and an 1880s Museum Entry

After the sensor failed, I went back to the online seller's website to find proof that the product existed. Instead, I found an About Us page with a photo of an old brass microscope. Below the photo was a line that read exactly: 'microscope gold coast mining company 1880s.'

At first I thought it was a caption. Then I copied the phrase into Google and found a museum record about microscopes supplied to the Gold Coast Mining Company in the 1880s. The seller had copied that historical text to make its brand look old and trustworthy. A company that copies its history is hiding the fact that it has no history.

That museum photo is now the image I think of whenever someone sends me a quote covered in logos. A FARO logo can be placed on a PDF by anyone. A heritage story can be pasted onto a website by anyone. Neither one answers the only real procurement questions: who built this, who calibrated it, and who supports it?

What I Ask Now Before Any Order

I still look for good prices. But I ask different questions first. The first one is not 'what's the price?' It's 'what is not included?' Then I ask 'who can confirm the serial number?' and 'who picks up the phone when this stops working?'

Last month, we ordered the new FARO CMM arm from an authorized distributor. The total was not the lowest quote on the table. But the quote had line items for everything: hardware, software, initial calibration, training, freight, and future calibration reminders. The number on that quote was close to the number I had to explain to finance. That is what a transparent price looks like. There is something satisfying about a quote where the amount on the paper matches the amount I have to defend later.

Brand names are not magic. They are shortcuts that only work when the seller can back them with real records. FARO means something when the CMM's service history is traceable. IFM, Omron, and Keyence mean something when the spec sheet matches the part. And if a seller ever tells you it started in the 1880s because it found a microscope photo from a Gold Coast mining company, run. The real instrument in that story is the seller's imagination, not the microscope.

Share this article Discuss with Faro
Marcus Feld

Marcus Feld

Marcus Feld is an electrical test and measurement analyst specializing in multimeters, oscilloscopes, clamp meters, insulation testers, spectrum analyzers, and data loggers. He applies IEC 61010-2-030 and IEC 61010-031 concepts while examining measurement category, bandwidth, true-RMS response, input loading, and stated uncertainty. His work helps maintenance engineers and test teams choose safe instruments with performance suited to the signals and environments they actually measure.

Leave a Reply